4x4

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 1/8/15 8:19 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> What kind of action would you expect? Renaming a name
> which has been used for two years now without complaints, simply
> because it looks bad in the new documentation?
>
> As we usually don't rename functions with inconsistent naming or
> otherwise bad names because of  backwards compatibility (TM) I guess
> that's not what you want. OTOH I'm not sure if ddox could be much
> improved in this regard. Maybe it shouldn't display the full name,
> only Class.member. But I don't really know what you expect.

I was thinking along the way of simplifying documentation and links. -- 
Andrei