Is anyone working on a D source code formatting tool?

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d]

On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 02:05:09 +0000
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 12:43:05 UTC, ketmar via 
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:37:22 +0000
> > Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/01/2015 22:11, Walter Bright wrote:
> >> > On 1/10/2015 12:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> >> >
> >> > 2. it tends to end bikeshedding arguments about the right 
> >> > way to format
> >> > things
> >> 
> >> No, it wouldn't. The tool would have to support formatting 
> >> options, not just one style (or the tool would be crap). And 
> >> even then, people could argue about what the default 
> >> formatting should be...
> > default should be one that used in Phobos.
> 
> phobos is very APIish, most of business logic do not look like 
> that.
that's why formatter must have alot of options to tune. but *default*
set must be one that used in Phobos. just to end any converstion like
this with "'cause it's used in Phobos. period."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150116/da6952f3/attachment-0001.sig>