http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP25 has been preliminarily approved for 2.067

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 16 January 2015 at 21:55:13 UTC, Zach the Mystic wrote:
> On Friday, 16 January 2015 at 21:41:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
> wrote:
>> Please help us work the kinks out! Walter will be proceeding 
>> with the opt-in implementation for quicker pipelining.
>>
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP25
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>
> I'm working on an article/DIP which actually goes further than 
> the new DIP25, but is nonetheless completely compatible with 
> it. I'll have the article in a day or two.

I'm very interested in that!

I think the `return` notation is a good idea, and can maybe be 
reused in a more complete `scope` proposal. A downside is that it 
only applies to the return value, but not to other `out` and 
`ref` parameters. But the `!` syntax can work here, too.