post qualifier and template constraint limitation, is there a reason ?

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 1/17/15 3:33 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> This is accepted :
> auto fun(T)(T T) inout if(...) { ... }
>
> This is not :
> auto fun(T)(T T) if(...) inout { ... }
>
> Is there a reason ?


I kind of agree with you. Because this is short for:

template fun(T) if(...) { auto fun(T t) inout {...}}

I think it makes the most sense to put the constraint right after the 
template.

BUT:

1. I don't think there should be 2 ways to do this
2. The current requirement is not so horrible.

I would leave it alone.

-Steve