forcing "@nogc" on class destructors

[Meta via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 18:25:42 UTC, ketmar via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> how likely this to be changed? is there *any* chances of that 
> in 2015?
> 2016? and why we can't just remove that restriction when new GC 
> will be
> implemented? removing the "@nogc" requirement on class dtors 
> will break
> *nothing* *at* *all*. yet adding it now, while we don't have 
> that new
> GC, will prevent alot of bugs that can slip in crack.
>
> btw, you won the prize of not talking about "broken code"! 
> sadly, i
> forgot to setup the prizes... anyway, thanks for sane argument.

Is it that subtle of a bug? Your program crashes once, you go on 
the forums and find the answer, and then you know never to do it 
again.