forcing "@nogc" on class destructors

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 1/20/15 4:10 PM, "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?= 
<ola.fosheim.grostad+dlang at gmail.com>" wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 20:51:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> On 1/20/15 3:39 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>>> and all that mess can be avoided just by enforcing the one simple rule,
>>> which compiler is perfectly able to check.
>>
>> I think the current situation is fine.
>
> In other words, memory safety is no longer a goal.
>
> Excellent!  I hope that means the effort wasted on memory safety will be
> used to address the other weak spots instead, such as the syntax.

How's that? The current runtime aborts on memory allocation inside the 
GC collection routine, it's not a memory safety issue.

-Steve