forcing "@nogc" on class destructors

Wed Jan 21 02:07:40 PST 2015

On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 09:54:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> What is the status quo is irrelevant. You make a claim, you 
> substantiate.

You need to take a course called "the philosophy of science".

You've made a claim that concurrent GC is what is needed for 
competitive system level programming support. "Competitive" 
meaning you can get close to peak performance.

A peer reviewed reference is all you need to provide.

That can't be too much to ask for, given that GC is a well 
researched field in computer science.