[WORK] groupBy is in! Next: aggregate

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 16:44:20 UTC, Ulrich Küttler wrote:
> Andrei had a point about `partition` being used already. I 
> liked Oliver's suggestion to go with slice-something. `sliceBy` 
> might be worth considering. It even hints at the (efficient) 
> implementation.

Does it return slices?

If not, pick a different verb, e.g. "split".