521 days, 22 hours, 7 minutes and 52 seconds...
Zach the Mystic via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jan 26 13:51:01 PST 2015
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 19:50:39 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> If it takes just as much effort to get it into std.experimental
> as it
> would take to get into std directly, I don't see the point of
> the
> additional hassle introduced by std.experimental.
>
>
> T
I agree - be shameless with what you put in std.experimental.
Otherwise it has no purpose. Really, the whole point of such a
package is so you can safely *ignore* all the trolls and
naysayers on reddit, newsgroups, slashdot, etc... so that you can
work on the libraries. There should be no shame whatsoever in
breaking code that uses std.experimental, nor any pretense that
it's anything but a playground for working out kinks.
std.experimental is a warehouse where things are tried and
scrapped regularly. The only reason it exists is to say that
these particular *kinds* of tasks are "preapproved" for phobos.
It says *nothing* about whether the current implementation will
be here next month or not. Everything in std.experimental is
"still in the shop", subject to complete and instantaneous recall
at any time.
Otherwise, ask yourself, what's the point of std.experimental at
all? You just like giving people 13 extra characters to type when
you make guarantees?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list