accept @pure @nothrow @return attributes

[Zach the Mystic via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 23:50:12 UTC, Zach the Mystic wrote:
> Yes it *is* another debate. Now you can't add attributes at the 
> beginning:
>
> // no can do anymore
> nogc pure myUda
> retType funcName() {
>    ...
> }
>
> // must do this instead
> retType funcName() nogc pure myUdal {
> }
>
> You're suggesting canceling a whole style of labeling a 
> function, aren't you? It's a big change. I wouldn't accept it 
> unless it demonstrated a clear advantage. In fact, maybe it 
> *can* demonstrate such, having all D functions be uniform in 
> how their attributes are written, but you'll need a whole new 
> thread and a DIP, and personally I don't see this carrying its 
> weight.

Also, aren't attribute blocks made impossible by this?:

nogc:

auto myFunc() { ... }
auto myOtherFunc() { ... }