accept @pure @nothrow @return attributes

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 14:30:47 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 13:20:24 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> But in this case I see no improvement that could justify it.
>
> Fixes problems people have with inconsistent attribute syntax, 
> see discussion at https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13388

Yes, but as it has been already mentioned in this thread new 
system is as much inconsistent - it simply has moved 3 of 
attributes from one "camp" to another. If idea was to separate 
attributes that affect mangling/type then we still have 
protection attributes. And with no plans to deprecate old syntax 
even more inconsistency had been introduced. Same goes for 
possible introduction of new attributes - if syntax for those and 
UDA is identical, it can break code same as introducing new 
keywords. I don't see any _vision_ behind the change, just moving 
bits around.

It is not well-thought.