accept @pure @nothrow @return attributes

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 14:41:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> And with no plans to deprecate old syntax even more 
> inconsistency had been introduced.

When the problem arises, then.

> Same goes for possible introduction of new attributes - if 
> syntax for those and UDA is identical, it can break code same 
> as introducing new keywords.

Same for any symbol. Do you have a solution?

> I don't see any _vision_ behind the change, just moving bits 
> around.
>
> It is not well-thought.

@pure, @nothrow and @return are relatively obscure attributes, so 
if they change, it should cause minor commotion. If you want to 
overhaul everything, you can propose a DIP.