accept @pure @nothrow @return attributes

[Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 29 January 2015 at 00:14:51 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> that's good. as we already have at least 4 codebases to build 
> tools upon,
> and you gave up using that and insisting on writing another 
> one, and
> failed... i doubt that your tool was really important or even 
> usable. so
> now i don't have to try another tool just to throw it away.

That's exactly right. I gave up on using dscanner and insisted on 
writing dscanner instead.