FAQ for newbies who see pure @safe nothrow @nogc
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jan 29 10:38:31 PST 2015
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 at 17:51:06 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 January 2015 at 17:32:30 UTC, Nick Treleaven
> wrote:
>> No, the idea proposed was:
>>
>> @safe @override const func();
>> @abstract class C{}
>> const var = 5;
>> __gshared gvar = 4;
>>
>> const is never @const. @abstract is always @abstract. It is
>> variables that don't use @attribute syntax. This is not
>> something I invented, it follows on from existing uses of
>> @attributes and __keywords already supported by dmd.
>
> Nick I'm putting together the FAQ right now. I don't quite
> understand this proposal. Could you outline it for me? I'd
> like to know exactly what words would require an '@' symbol.
> What is the criteria for when to use an '@' and when not to use
> one? This current rule is (use '@' if it is not a
> keyword)...so what would the new rule be? Thanks.
Does it really matter ? Please put your first post in there and
be done with it. These proposal are not gonna happen anyway (the
ROI is simply not there).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list