forcing "@nogc" on class destructors

[Jerry Morrison via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 11:32:26 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
Grøstad wrote:
> But I think GC and destructors are not a good match... so I 
> would personally go for performance and no destructors.

Yes. That is the bottom line.

A good match for GC is the phantom reference, which notifies you 
when an object gets collected with no way to resurrect the 
collected object or access its instance variables.