Should we remove int[$] before 2.067?

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d]

On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 18:08:13 +0000, Gary Willoughby wrote:

> We don't want the situation of C++ where people only use 80% of it's
> features and that 80% is different for everyone. I've recently been
> writing some Go code and it's become clear to me just how big of a
> language D really is.

that is the plan for D? screw the expressiveness, do it One Right Way? 
fsck, WHY DIDN'T YOU WROTE THAT ON THE FRONT PAGE?! i was thinking about 
opposite...

p.s. should i submit patches to remove everything that is doable with 
libraries? my particular target is so-called "floating point numbers". 
they only adds complexity to codegen and parser, and all floating point 
functions can be written in pure D. ah, and integer multiplication as a 
low-hanging fruit.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150130/f8bbf9b2/attachment.sig>