version: multiple conditions

[Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 1 July 2015 at 11:18:17 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:16:13 +0000, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
>
>> Quite a few niche-libraries are C++ only.
>
> throw 'em away, they full of bugs and broken code anyway.

Qt? AFAIK, it's C++-only, and it's widely considered to be one of 
the best GUI toolkits out there. Sure, having a library be in C 
or provide C bindings makes it more compatible with other 
languages, which is nice you're using another language, but the 
fact that someone chooses to use C++ instead of C for their 
library doesn't make it junk, and plenty of folks care primarily 
about C++, in which case, it's a non-issue.

- Jonathan M Davis