Initial feedback for std.experimental.image

[Meta via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 6 July 2015 at 13:48:53 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> I believe it is ready for initial feedback because I feel it is 
> moving towards "controversial" territory in its design. With 
> the file format support.
> I just need to know that I am going in the right direction as 
> of now. There is no point in continuing the image 
> reading/writing support like it is, if nobody likes it.

For ImageStorage, why provide both pixelAt/pixelStoreAt (bad 
naming IMO) and opIndex/opIndexAssign?