Extend D's switch statement?

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 07/08/2015 11:32 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 07/08/2015 07:33 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
>>
>> The compiler complexity introduced by this change is trivial.
>
> Except trivial doesn't mean it's cheap. Would probably take 1-2 days to
> fully spec/implement/optimize/test/document it.
> In that time I could finish a thread cache for the GC, or GC-less smart
> pointers, or finish dub watch, or reduce binary sizes, or finish OSX
> shared libraries, or join 10 more forum discussions.
>
>> This is completely self-contained.
>
> But is it useful enough to spend the effort and extend the language?
>

I just noted that increased compiler complexity is absolutely not a 
reason not to implement this.