Wait, what? What is AliasSeq?

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/15/15 9:54 AM, rsw0x wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 July 2015 at 13:47:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> On 7/15/15 9:28 AM, Deadalnix wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 15 July 2015 at 08:29:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Tuple is the only name where we have actual, factual feedback. Hanging
>>> in the d irc chan for years, it is apparent that calling this tuple
>>> confuse people. That is a fact.
>>
>> It doesn't confuse me. We have type tuples and expression tuples
>> defined in the spec. An alias tuple can have both expressions and
>> types. It's not that confusing. What was confusing is that a TypeTuple
>> was not a type tuple as defined in the spec.
>>
>> All those tuples are already not the same as tuples as defined from
>> other languages. So all three explanations are going to confuse some
>> people. I don't think we can come up with a name that doesn't confuse
>> some set of people.
>>
>> This issue of naming this one thing is so long in the tooth, we need
>> to just move on IMO.
>>
>
> To repeat what I already said, the issue is not the name but the
> documentation.
>
> How many here have read the page on tuples?
> http://dlang.org/tuple.html
>
> Give it a read through and tell me you aren't confused as hell.

That document needs to be rewritten. I don't consider it part of the 
spec per-se, but it's definitely out of date.

-Steve