Wait, what? What is AliasSeq?

[Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d]

On 16-Jul-2015 19:13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 7/16/15 11:59 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:50:25AM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu via
>> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>> On 7/15/15 8:49 PM, Mike wrote:
>>>> 1. "AliasSeq" is no good as evident from the first post that started
>>>> this thread
>>>
>>> I am egging my face for starting this. Can we please return to
>>> AliasSeq? -- Andrei
>>
>> Yes, let's please return to AliasSeq. It's a pretty lousy name, but all
>> the alternatives are even worse. Let's not fix the problem by making it
>> worse.
>
> WE HAVE CONSENSUS! :o)
>
> (Well... anyone else in favor?)

Fine by me.
Being the one who merged that pull in the first place I'm somewhat biased...


-- 
Dmitry Olshansky