dmd 2.068, 2.069, 2.0xx Evil Plan going forward
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jul 20 11:08:49 PDT 2015
On 2015-07-20 18:32, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> It's missing the most important piece of semver, the fact that the major
> version number denotes backwards incompatible changes. If D were using
> semver, we would be somewhere between D10 and D15.
Since we're about to release 2.068.0, I would say D68 ;). I'm actually
quite serious. Every single release since at least 2.050 has broken at
least one of my projects.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list