dmd 2.068, 2.069, 2.0xx Evil Plan going forward

Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jul 21 02:04:34 PDT 2015


Am Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:54:44 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com>:

> On 7/20/2015 11:34 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> > I got this number from Daniel, he didn't found a reason.
> > Chances are it's uniformly slower because of dmd's backend, but of
> > course profiling might help.
> 
> Consider that the Win32 version of dmd is built with with the same
> backend as dmd. If there's a slowdown with that version, it isn't due
> to the backend.

"On Win32 the performance difference is much smaller, because it's
going from compiling with dmc to compiling with dmd"

https://youtu.be/5daHGXSetXk?t=2438



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list