dmd 2.068, 2.069, 2.0xx Evil Plan going forward

Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jul 21 02:06:51 PDT 2015


On 21 July 2015 at 11:04, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> Am Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:54:44 -0700
> schrieb Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com>:
>
>> On 7/20/2015 11:34 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> > I got this number from Daniel, he didn't found a reason.
>> > Chances are it's uniformly slower because of dmd's backend, but of
>> > course profiling might help.
>>
>> Consider that the Win32 version of dmd is built with with the same
>> backend as dmd. If there's a slowdown with that version, it isn't due
>> to the backend.
>
> "On Win32 the performance difference is much smaller, because it's
> going from compiling with dmc to compiling with dmd"
>

You beat me to it....


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list