Rant after trying Rust a bit

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jul 26 08:20:04 PDT 2015


On 7/25/15 6:54 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 10:05:35 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
>> On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 09:40:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> if the template body uses an interface not present in the type and
>>> not checked for in the constraint, you will *still* get a compile
>>> time error.
>>
>> But only if the template gets instantiated with a bad type. Unit tests
>> don't catch every thing and have to be written properly. A proper type
>> system should catch it.
>
> This unitest argument is becoming ridiculous. Unless some strong
> argument is brought to the table that this differs from the "dynamic
> typing is not a problem if you write unitest" we we all should know is
> bogus at this point, it can't be taken seriously.

To me that's self understood. Run time is fundamentally different from 
everything preceding it. -- Andrei


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list