Rant after trying Rust a bit
Tobias Müller via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jul 26 11:13:30 PDT 2015
Alix Pexton <alix.DOT.pexton at gmail.DOT.com> wrote:
> On 25/07/2015 9:48 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, Bruce Eckel's seminal article on it
>> http://www.mindview.net/Etc/Discussions/CheckedExceptions has
>> disappeared. Eckel is not a Java code monkey, he wrote the book Thinking
>> In Java
>> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0131002872/
>>
>
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/20150515072240/http://www.mindview.net/Etc/Discussions/CheckedExceptions
This is article not convincing at all. His argument is basically "Most
programmers are sloppy and tend to catch and ignore checked exceptions."
The same programmers that do this will just catch all RuntimeExceptions at
top level, write a log entry and proceed.
That's actually not much better and certainly not correct error handling.
Tobi
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list