Rant after trying Rust a bit

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/26/2015 3:44 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> or template code (which will blow up at instanciation time, or worse, do random
> shit).

Um, all Rust traits do is test for a method signature match, so it compiles. It 
is NOT a defense against a random method that just happens to match and does 
some other unrelated random shit.

For example, the '+' operator. Rust traits sez "gee, there's a + operator, it's 
good to go. Ship it!" Meanwhile, you thought the function was summing some data, 
when it actually is creating a giant string, or whatever idiot thing someone 
decided to use '+' for.

Rust still has not obviated the necessity for unit tests, nor is Rust remotely 
able to guarantee your code doesn't "do random shit" if it compiles.