Last call for AliasSeq

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 07/28/2015 02:00 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 11:52:32 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 11:50:09 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
>>> Nothing in your post gives us a clue which kind of name would be
>>> better. In particular, it doesn't show that `AliasSeq` is any better
>>> than `TypeTuple`. So we're changing it from a bad name to one that
>>> could be even worse, for all we know.
>>
>> Neither do we know anything about the other alternatives.
>>
>>> It seems you and deadalnix actually have useful evidence that can
>>> answer these questions, but neither of you posted them. Please do!
>>
>> What sort of evidence are you hoping for?
>>
>>  — David
>
> We know which is most popular :)
>
> So far the only concrete "evidence" that any one has is the poll. Every
> thing else is just speculation and anecdotes. No one else has bothered
> to collect any other evidence.

What the poll has shown is that no proposed name is significantly more 
popular than 3 on a scale from 1 to 5.