Daily downloads in decline

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:51:44 UTC, Meta wrote:
> On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:48:01 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
>> at the risk of sounding like a broken record, if ldc/gdc not 
>> being 2.067 stops a DDMD release due to dmd's generated code 
>> being too slow, maybe it's time to phase dmd out ;)
>
> Once SDC is at a point where it can compile most of or all D 
> code that DMD compiles, it would be a good replacement.

Waiting for your PR :)