rvalue references
via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jun 3 03:07:40 PDT 2015
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 18:06:32 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 17:22:07 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:02:56 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>>> Thanks to DIP 25 I think it's time to review this again. I
>>> would implement it (if no one else wants to do it), but there
>>> are still some unanswered questions:
>>>
>>> 1. Is 'auto ref' still the chosen syntax (I guess so)?
>>
>> Why not `scope ref` (or `in ref` == `const scope ref`)?
>
> See DIP 36
I don't see an argument against `scope ref` in DIP36, quite the
opposite...
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list