Negation of attributes (DIP 79)

[Kenji Hara via Digitalmars-d]

For final, override, abstract, and synchronized attributes, I'm trying to
relax the limitation in:

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2091
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4714

Kenji Hara

2015-06-03 13:47 GMT+09:00 ketmar via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com>:

> On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 02:40:55 +0200, Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> > On 06/03/15 01:41, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >> On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 18:49:09 +0200, Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 06/02/15 14:21, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >>>> this opens a can of worms. should this be accepted too:
> >>>>   enum doItFinal = false;
> >>>>   final(doItFinal)
> >>>> ?
> >>>>
> >>>> or even
> >>>>   final(someFunnyTemplate!(with_, args, andOtherTemplate!"too"))
> >>>> ?
> >
> >>> Of course.
> >>
> >> this is bad. it smells. it adds almost nothing in terms of uniformity.
> >> and i'm sure that Hackerpilot will be happy to know that he now needs a
> >> full-blown D interpreter to determine if some method is virtual or not.
> >> ;-)
> >
> > An interpreter is required anyway.
>
> and the idea is still bad.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150603/82815e4f/attachment.html>