Daily downloads in decline

[extrawurst via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 19:02:15 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 20:47, weaselcat wrote:
>> at the risk of sounding like a broken record, if ldc/gdc not 
>> being 2.067
>> stops a DDMD release due to dmd's generated code being too 
>> slow, maybe
>> it's time to phase dmd out ;)
>
> It's past the time.
>
> The traction and support that Rust gained, even before 1.0, 
> showed that having your primary toolchain based on GCC or LLVM 
> is the only sustainable way forward (and even of those two, GCC 
> might not be able to keep with LLVM).

Nice work on the RustDT IDE btw. 
(https://users.rust-lang.org/t/rustdt-0-1-0-released-a-new-eclipse-rust-ide)