Honey, I shrunk the build times

ketmar via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jun 6 22:25:21 PDT 2015


On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:08:47 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> On 6/6/15 10:00 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>> On 7/06/2015 4:55 p.m., ketmar wrote:
>>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 21:30:02 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>
>>> so in the end, after endless talking how separate compilation sux and
>>> everyone should do one-step combined compilation, separate compilation
>>> wins. it's funny how i'm always right in the end.
>>
>> Nobody is always right.
>> But your way of thinking can be attractive if you like being evil.
>>
>> I'm evil :)
> 
> There might be a bit of misunderstanding on what that change does. --
> Andrei

it utilizes "partial separate compilation" to earn speed using parallel 
builds. the thing alot of people talking of before: separate compilation 
can use multicores with ease, while one-step-all compilation can't 
without significant changes in compiler internals.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150607/ec4897f3/attachment.sig>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list