Constructor inheritance? Why not?

[Kapps via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 02:39:22 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
> Is there any reason why constructors are not inherited? All 
> other methods are inherited, why not constructors?

It should be relatively easy to do this with a mixin in theory. 
Or even a CtorArgsTuple, allowing something like (not certain if 
this would work):
this(CtorArgsTuple!super args, bool animated) {
     super(args);
     this.animated = animated;
}
Also not sure if the '!super' would work as opposed to specifying 
the type.

This approach has the issue of not inheriting documentation 
though, which annoys me.