Template specializations in unittest blocks
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jun 8 11:22:49 PDT 2015
On 6/8/15 2:10 PM, Jeffrey Tsang wrote:
> The following works:
>
> enum foo(int x) = x + foo!(x - 1);
> enum foo(int x : 0) = 0;
>
> enum bar(T) = cast(T) 3;
> enum bar(T : int) = 4;
>
> Wrap it in a unittest{}, and complaints about multiply defined templates
> hit. Is there a reason for this?
To expand on what Timon said, a unittest block is actually a function
under the hood.
Try the same thing inside a function and you will get the same issue.
Do this instead (outside of the unit test block):
version(unittest) {
... // same thing
}
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list