Template specializations in unittest blocks
Jeffrey Tsang via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jun 8 11:26:13 PDT 2015
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 18:22:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> On 6/8/15 2:10 PM, Jeffrey Tsang wrote:
>> The following works:
>>
>> enum foo(int x) = x + foo!(x - 1);
>> enum foo(int x : 0) = 0;
>>
>> enum bar(T) = cast(T) 3;
>> enum bar(T : int) = 4;
>>
>> Wrap it in a unittest{}, and complaints about multiply defined
>> templates
>> hit. Is there a reason for this?
>
> To expand on what Timon said, a unittest block is actually a
> function under the hood.
>
> Try the same thing inside a function and you will get the same
> issue.
>
> Do this instead (outside of the unit test block):
>
> version(unittest) {
> ... // same thing
> }
>
> -Steve
OK, that makes much more sense. Thanks.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list