static foreach considered

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/8/15 2:14 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> I would assume that it would be pretty much the same as doing
>
> foreach(T; TypeTuple!(...))
> {
>      ...
> }
>
> except that you're not forced to shove everything in a TypeTuple.

I'm even fine with the type tuple, just allow at declaration level and 
don't introduce a scope. Would be a great start. -- Andrei