[OT] Modules dropped out of C++17

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 13:43:45 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 10/06/15 15:37, Kagamin wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 08:53:40 UTC, Shachar Shemesh 
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/06/15 11:31, Kagamin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Huh? If you have type's method diskIdx and a local variable 
>>>> diskIdx, and
>>>> they are confusing, what it has to do with UFCS?
>>>
>>> auto diskIdx = data.diskIdx();
>>
>> auto diskIdx1 = this.diskIdx;
>> diskIdx1 = f(diskIdx1);
>> return diskIdx;
>
> Was this meant to prove that you can make it confusing?

It was your requirement that variables and methods must be 
similar.

> What does "diskIdx1" mean?

Same as in your example, a variable, which receives the disk 
index.

> What does f do?

Processes the disk index and returns another index according to 
its logic.

> Is "this.diskIdx" a member or a function?

A property, which extracts the disk index as you described the 
function.

> where did the diskIdx you returned came from?

It's defined as a member of the type.