foreach with a default range
Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 11 14:06:24 PDT 2015
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 20:54:46 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> It makes sense, and is very extendable, and uniform. You can
> deal with this much easier when imlplementing some sort of
> wrapping than one that has to do something different depending
> on how many args are passed inside the []. I like the new way.
Well, considering that we're talking about a _slicing_ operation,
and not an indexing operation, I'm not about to start using
opIndex for it unless I'm forced to.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list