DIP80: phobos additions

[Wyatt via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 03:18:31 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
>
> What would the new order of operations be for these new 
> operators?

Hadn't honestly thought that far.  Like I said, it was more of a 
nascent idea than a coherent proposal (probably with a DIP and 
many more words).  It's an interesting question, though.

I think the approach taken by F# and OCaml may hit at the right 
notes, though: precedence and fixity are determined by the base 
operator.  In my head, extra operators would be represented in 
code by some annotation or affix on a built-in operator... say, 
braces around it or something (e.g. [*] or {+}, though this is 
just an example that sets a baseline for visibility).

-Wyatt