Question about garbage collection specification

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d]

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 12:28:13 +0000, rsw0x wrote:

> There's not even a warning on them that they're violating the garbage
> collector specification, don't you think that's a little important?

i believe that if one needs to do such things, he is knowledgeable enough 
to foresee the possible consequences. this is not what casual programmer 
does, so one is expected to know some internals.

yet warning may be helpful too, Marc submitted a PR for that. ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150613/f7b0b100/attachment.sig>