std.(experimental.)logger voting manager wanted

[weaselcat via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 15:43:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 6/12/15 5:58 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
>> std.(experimental.)logger has been in phobos for one release. 
>> The idea
>> was to mature stuff in experimental for one release and then 
>> have a vote
>> on inclusion into phobos as std.logger.
>>
>> I would like to see this vote happen before 2.068.
>> Unfortunately, Dicebot is not longer the review manager.
>>
>> Who wants to count yes/no/(my logger is better) votes in a 
>> forum thread?
>
> I'd say we hold off on this until we finalize reference 
> counting. Right now std.logger requires GC. -- Andrei

"proper" reference counting would be trivial to implement with a 
real macro system.