std.(experimental.)logger voting manager wanted

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/13/15 9:22 AM, weaselcat wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 15:43:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 6/12/15 5:58 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
>>> std.(experimental.)logger has been in phobos for one release. The idea
>>> was to mature stuff in experimental for one release and then have a vote
>>> on inclusion into phobos as std.logger.
>>>
>>> I would like to see this vote happen before 2.068.
>>> Unfortunately, Dicebot is not longer the review manager.
>>>
>>> Who wants to count yes/no/(my logger is better) votes in a forum thread?
>>
>> I'd say we hold off on this until we finalize reference counting.
>> Right now std.logger requires GC. -- Andrei
>
> "proper" reference counting would be trivial to implement with a real
> macro system.

The true Scotsman, eh :o). Well we don't have a real macro system. -- Andrei