Phobos addition formal review: std.experimental.allocator
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jun 13 23:49:29 PDT 2015
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 00:24:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> So we have:
>
> * 1 request to change names;
> * 3 requests to wank around the directory structure;
> * 0 of everything else.
>
> Sigh.
That is to be expected and intended for formal Phobos review.
Implementation is not of much interest - it can be fixed at any
point. Most important thing is to ensure that API feels right,
documentation feels clear and people are in general comfortable
with using proposed modules as they are.
I will do more in-depth review but it will _all_ be about API and
docs and naming.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list