version: multiple conditions

weaselcat via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jun 14 05:06:02 PDT 2015


On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 11:33:52 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 11:26:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
> wrote:
>> On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 11:05:36 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>>> p.s. i.e. it boils down to simple thing: Walter don't like 
>>> it. period.
>>> any rationalizing of that is pointless.
>>
>> The most sensible thing to do with all these may/may not be an 
>> improvement and also the break/don't break my code issues is 
>> to create an experimental branch of DMD after the transition 
>> from C++ to D is finished. Then merge back the good stuff 
>> after several iterations of improvement.
>>
>> I'm sure Walter will be much more open to changes if there is 
>> a proven demand for it, e.g. if people rave about certain 
>> features in an experimental branch. Changing the main branch 
>> with "might be a little bit better" changes is a hard sell 
>> when competing languages are going stable.
>
> Not all of them
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/39f2t7/planned_breaking_change_in_rust_11/

not really surprising considering rust was rushed out the door, 
there were no breaks on that hype train.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list