Question about garbage collection specification

Mon Jun 15 08:12:48 PDT 2015

On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:01:58 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

> We can create new types of pointers, remove void * from the language,
> and get rid of unions, and yes, *ONLY THEN* we can have a GC that takes
> advantage of this.
> 
> These are painful, massively breaking changes. It's not going to happen.

i'm dreaming of making unions that contains GC objects invalid. it simply 
begs for troubles!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150615/ae0eb025/attachment-0001.sig>