std.container: fork in the road

[Wyatt via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 15:29:34 UTC, ixid wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 14:57:40 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
>> but std.collection isn't nearly so good a name.
>>
> std.container2 and so on?

Dunno.  That's not something that really needs addressed right 
now, is it?  Off-the-cuff, in an ideal world there would be some 
way of easily knowing which API was intended and forwarding to 
std.deprecated on an as-needed basis (with a warning when it 
happens).  But "sanity" and "API versioning" may exist at 
opposite ends of a spectrum, if I recall my history.

-Wyatt