Workaround for typeid access violation
Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jun 17 15:19:07 PDT 2015
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 21:28:46 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 20:19:45 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
>> I am no compiler/runtime guru, but it sounds like if it were
>> possible to make this a swappable option for D this might be
>> very important. Is this true, and how much work is involved
>> in making this industrial strength?
>
> that it falls apart as soon as you introduce any form of
> non-message passing threading and/or global variables?
you can't make a special section for shared memory and global
variables without incurring very high performance costs under
this apporach?
> if it was this easy, it would be done already.
I personally have found this to be a poor heuristic in life.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list