auto ref is on the docket
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jun 21 23:33:37 PDT 2015
On 6/21/15 11:11 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> No, that's not quite as nice a lowering, but it would avoid a lot of
> extraneous function definitions.
I think a lowering is a must. Matters are complicated as they are, I
don't want to add new rules.
Combinatorial issues can be addressed by either generating the functions
on demand, or by lowering at the client side.
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list