auto ref is on the docket

[kinke via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 23:04:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 06/23/2015 12:18 AM, kinke wrote:
>>>> In C++ there's no problem with const&, so why they will be 
>>>> in D?
>>>
>>> Because const is transitive in D and therefore more 
>>> restrictive.
>>
>> That's not a reason.
>
> Yes it is.
>
>> It's just an additional restriction imposed by D and only 
>> prevents
>> you from using the proposed `in ref T`/`const auto ref T` 
>> *shudder*
>> equivalents if const-transitiveness would be violated. In my
>> day-to-day C++ work, I almost never have to do that.
>
> Note "almost".

Ah, I remember you from another rvalue discussion some years ago. 
;)
Care to share an example where transitive const is a problem 
apart from obvious lazily caching stuff? I don't think I've 
encountered any lately.